The Woman in Black — My Review
That’s really all that needs to be said. I never finished the book. I did see the play when I was in London. A friend of mine sent me a copy of the radio show. Now I’ve finally gotten around to seeing the movie and I loved it.
Daniel Radcliffe was very good. He’s always had that haunted look in his eyes, even in his first production. He played the lead as young David Copperfield in BBC One’s television movie. I’ve seen him in that, My Boy Jack, The December Boys, and of course the Harry Potter series. He’s also been on Broadway and in the West End. I was worried they’d try to take this ghost/horror story and try to “jazz” it up by getting the young Radcliffe so a younger audience would attend. And when I saw that it was rated PG-13, I really feared the producers would try to play to a much younger audience (okay, specifically, teenage girls with a crush on “The Chosen One”).
They didn’t. The movie does not disappoint. Even Husband jumped a few times during it.
If I have to rate the productions I’ve seen/experienced, I still have to give the play top honors. In the play, there are only two men onstage and in the program’s notes. They never say that there’s a female who also appears and you never know if/when she’ll show up. The skin-crawling creepiness of the play was excellent. I would have to place the movie and the radio play as a tie because with the radio play you still use your imagination and can be genuinely scared. With the movie, you get the great visuals and an expanded cast that helps make it more dramatic.
So, there it is. Didn’t see anything worth watching on television so I figured I’d see the movie on Blu-Ray. Now I’m watching Waiting for Guffman. Yeah….I have weird tastes.